Prognostic factors in the diagnosis and treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma

Cancer ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 939-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian F. Pollack ◽  
L. Dade Lunsford ◽  
John C. Flickinger ◽  
H. Lee Dameshek
Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2934
Author(s):  
Sabine Seidel ◽  
Michelle Margold ◽  
Thomas Kowalski ◽  
Alexander Baraniskin ◽  
Roland Schroers ◽  
...  

Patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) not fulfilling inclusion criteria for clinical trials represent an underreported population. Thirty-four consecutive PCNSL patients seen at our center between 2005 and 2019 with exclusion criteria for therapeutic trials were analyzed (non-study patients) and compared with patients from the G-PCNSL-SG-1 (German PCNSL Study Group 1) study (study patients), the largest prospective multicenter trial on PCNSL, comprising 551 patients. Median follow up was 68 months (range 1–141) in non-study patients and 51 months (1–105) in study patients. Twenty-seven/34 (79.4%) non-study patients received high dose methotrexate (HDMTX), while seven/34 (20.6%) with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 50 mL/min did not. Median overall survival (OS) was six months (95% confidence interval [CI] 0–21 months) in those 34 non-study patients. The 27 non-study patients treated with HDMTX were compared with 526/551 G-PCNSL-SG-1 study patients who had received HDMTX as well. Median OS was 20 months (95% CI 0–45)/21 months (95% CI 18–25) in 27 non-study/526 study patients (p = 0.766). Favorable prognostic factors in non-study patients were young age, application of HDMTX and early response on magnet resonance imaging (MRI). If HDMTX-based chemotherapy can be applied, long-term disease control is possible even in patients not qualifying for clinical trials. Initial response on early MRI might be useful for decision on treatment continuation.


Leukemia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1797-1807 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Deckert ◽  
A Engert ◽  
W Brück ◽  
A J M Ferreri ◽  
J Finke ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Hunt ◽  
Kristoph Jahnke ◽  
Tulio P. Murillo ◽  
Edward A. Neuwelt

Object White matter diseases, including demyelinating or inflammatory disorders, may be indistinguishable clinically and radiologically from some central nervous system (CNS) tumors. In such situations, determination of the final diagnosis is difficult. An example is the differential diagnosis of non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome–related primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and multiple sclerosis (MS), a demyelinating disease. Unfortunately, delayed diagnosis and treatment of PCNSL can negatively affect prognosis. Methods The authors reviewed the cases of eight patients with PCNSL or MS. In each case, the initial diagnosis (PCNSL or MS) was equivocal. In these cases, conventional diagnostic approaches were not definitive, thus further delaying diagnosis. The initial symptoms, the selected diagnostic tests, and the presumptive as well as final diagnosis for each case are discussed. The final diagnosis was PCNSL in six cases and MS in two. The uncertainty about the clinical or initial pathological presentation required further diagnostic evaluation in all cases. Two important neurosurgical guidelines are the avoidance of corticosteroid agents and performance of biopsy sampling rather than volumetric tumor resection. High-volume lumbar puncture, slit-lamp examination/vitrectomy, new CNS imaging techniques, and repeated biopsy procedures also proved helpful. Conclusions In PCNSL, early definitive diagnosis and treatment are the keys to successful outcomes. Knowledge of strategies essential to early diagnosis lessens the need for brain biopsy sampling, but this procedure is still usually necessary. In such selected cases, biopsy sampling is appropriate even when pathological investigation shows MS rather than PCNSL. Complete resection is not indicated in PCNSL and can lead to additional sequelae.


2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adília Hormigo ◽  
Lauren Abrey ◽  
Murk-Hein Heinemann ◽  
Lisa M. DeAngelis

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Kawai ◽  
Keisuke Miyake ◽  
Yuka Yamamoto ◽  
Yoshihiro Nishiyama ◽  
Takashi Tamiya

This paper summarizes the usefulness and limitation of positron emission tomography (PET) with18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in the diagnosis and treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). The18F-FDG uptake in typical PCNSL is about 2.5 times higher than that in the normal gray matter, and the tumor can usually be identified visually. The18F-FDG uptake pattern and value provide useful information for differentiating PCNSL from other enhancing malignant brain tumors especially glioblastoma (GB). The18F-FDG uptake in typical PCNSL is usually homogenous, and the uptake value is significantly higher than that in GB. However,18F-FDG PET often fails to show the presence of tumor in the brain as18F-FDG uptake is faint in atypical PCNSL such as disseminated or nonenhancing lesions.18F-FDG PET is also useful for evaluating the treatment response at a very early stage after the initial treatment. Pretreatment and posttreatment18F-FDG uptake values may have a prognostic value in patients with PCNSL. In conclusion,18F-FDG PET is very useful in the diagnosis of typical PCNSL and can differentiate PCNSL from other malignant brain tumors. However, the usefulness of18F-FDG PET is limited in the diagnosis of atypical PCNSL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document